MANILA, Philippines – President Ferdinand Marcos Jr.‘s recent announcement to ban all Philippine Offshore Gaming Operators (POGOs) was met with enthusiastic applause, but the specifics of the ban have raised questions and sparked debate among lawmakers and officials.
Pagcor chair Alejandro Tengco clarified that the ban will encompass all 43 remaining legal POGOs, which are now referred to as internet gaming licensees (IGLs). However, this has led to concerns about potential loopholes in enforcement due to the terminology change.
Lawmakers, including Albay Rep. Joey Salceda, have urged the President to differentiate between POGOs and IGLs, arguing that legal IGLs should not be affected by the ban.
Tengco explained that the term IGL was introduced as part of stricter regulations and rebranding efforts to address the negative stigma associated with POGOs, which have been linked to various crimes.
Despite the clarification, confusion persists, prompting calls for clearer guidelines and legislation to ensure the effective implementation of the ban.
Meanwhile, Interior Secretary Benjamin Abalos Jr. assured that there is sufficient time to identify key players and foreign workers in the POGO industry, paving the way for their eventual deportation.
Congress has also been directed to draft legislation that would solidify the President’s directive and prevent future administrations from reviving POGO operations.
While the ban on POGOs has been widely welcomed, Senate President Francis Escudero suggested a broader approach to gambling regulation, advocating for a total ban on all forms of gambling if it is deemed detrimental to society.
The debate over the POGO ban continues, with lawmakers and officials working towards a clear and effective implementation strategy while considering the potential implications for the gambling industry and the country.